Table 1The policy-only MLP used in the experiments
Empirical result Supported by saved experimental runs, not by a proof.
1 Paper text
| Component | Type | Dimensions | Activation/Normalisation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input | State representation | Two-frame: bits (1F: ) | None |
| Hidden 1 | Fully Connected | 1F: ; 2F: | LayerNorm + ReLU |
| Hidden 2 | Fully Connected | ReLU | |
| Policy Head | Linear Output | Raw logits; Log-Softmax in loss |
Generated from paper_jmlr.tex, lines 1012–1027.
2 Explain this
Both restoration agents use the same small multilayer perceptron: input, two hidden layers of width (the first with LayerNorm and ReLU, the second with ReLU) and a linear output of logits. There is no value head. The 2F model has a wider input ( bits) and therefore more first-layer parameters (20,480 in the reported setting).
3 How this is formalised
How this is covered. An empirical setup record from the saved notebook; not formalised. These are ordinary floating-point networks, not instances of the fixed-scale gate model.
| Paper anchor | table:arch (manuscript label) |
|---|---|
| Displayed as | Table 1 |
| Claim | The policy-only MLP used in the experiments |
| Coverage category | Empirical result |
| Statement source | paper_jmlr.tex lines 1012–1027; SHA-256 of the normalised block source 0463fce4170d5fb3… |
| Explanations | explain/table:arch, formal/table:arch |
| Build evidence | fresh isolated rebuild, audit report |
4 Lean statement and source
No Lean statement corresponds to this claim. This is an empirical statement about saved experimental runs. Lean proofs do not certify training runs, curves or checkpoints.
Build evidence: fresh isolated rebuild of all 38 bundled modules with Lean (version 4.26.0, started 2026-10-10T15:21:56Z, finished 2026-10-10T15:27:00Z: 38/38 modules compiled, 1588 axiom reports, no errors. See Build for the commands and the independent audit of 2026-10-10 (dated evidence).